Isakson Is Running – And I’m Supporting Him
This post was originally a column of mine from June 15, 2015. It was written the day after I learned Senator Isakson was battling Parkinson’s Disease. I was reminded of it earlier today having a Facebook conversation with a high school friend, who recently lost his dad after a long battle with Parkinson’s. I think it’s worth sharing again.
We’re almost a year and a half past that announcement, and three weeks away from the election. Senator Isakson still has my full support. He earned it long ago, and has never made me question why he had it in the first place.
Last Wednesday, Senator Johnny Isakson announced that he is suffering from Parkinson’s disease. He simultaneously released a statement from his doctor, and a detailed Q&A about the illness and his specific condition and prognosis. He made it clear that he intends to win re-election next fall and remain Georgia’s Senior Senator. I believe him, and continue to fully support him.
To be blunt, questions about Isakson’s health have followed him throughout his second term, as he suffered from a blood clot and a serious bacterial infection during his 2010 campaign. Some have been asking those questions out of genuine concern. Others, candidly, appear to have been motivated by not so thinly veiled political ambition.
My answer to those that have asked about his condition and whether he’s “really” running for re-election have been the same for years. This is Johnny Isakson we’re talking about. As long as he says is, he is.
That’s not being cute. Republicans are supposed to be the party that doesn’t question the meaning of the word “is”.
I believe Isakson is running without reservation or second thought because I’ve known him since the 80’s when I was in college. I’ve supported him for Governor, for Congress, and for Senator. I’ve held a fundraiser for him in my home. In political parlance, “We’ve met.”
In all of his races, and in all the positions he’s been elected or appointed to serve, he’s never given the easy answer. He’s always given his answer, and left it to the voters to decide if it is the right one. Even when his answer was unpopular. Especially when his answer was unpopular.
I was further able to internalize “he’s running for re-election” from a conversation we had over lunch about two years ago. It was an honor to have been asked to join him for a private discussion in DC. The day, scheduled a few weeks in advance, became a bit of a day to remember in Washington circles.
It was a day that I was able to observe almost an hour of angry calls from constituents because Isakson had the temerity to vote to open debate on a gun bill (with the goal to get vulnerable western Democrats on record). It was a day that Hazmat teams had closed one Senate office building and ricin was suspected on the floor above Isakson’s office. The staff, while handling all these calls, was quietly being told to make preparations to quickly evacuate their building if necessary.
Isakson is a man who was not only one of the architects of the modern Georgia Republican Party but was also a mason on the foundation crew. He’s put in the work his entire life. He’s been content to let others get the credit. And I sat and listened to the utter bitterness of new Republicans who would now stand on his shoulders to criticize because things don’t match an impossible idealism that can only exist in one’s own head. At the same time, the threats to physical safety that are now inherent to those who hold office and those that work for them became all too real.
It seemed quite thankless. Frankly, it made me angry.
So when Senator Isakson began lunch by saying he didn’t have a specific topic, I told him I had a question. After recounting what I had witnessed, and a general atmosphere where our “friends” were now the biggest critics, I could only ask “Why do we still do this?”
Yes, I said “we”. I don’t confuse the role a Senator plays with a guy that writes about politics, and certainly not the level of influence. Even my ego understands that. But in all the time I’ve known him, I’ve believed he and I do what we do for the same reasons. And, frankly, I was beginning to doubt that it was worth it.
What followed was 45 minutes of classic Johnny Isakson. In a very fatherly tone, he talked about his days in real estate. He said the deal he always wanted was the one that his agents told him was impossible. He always just asked one thing of those that brought him this news: Please get them to the closing table, and make sure I’m there.
Johnny Isakson has made a career of closing deals. He enjoys closing a deal to the point of reveling in it. The more challenging the deal, the more satisfying the closing.
The most challenging deal of his lifetime is fixing the direction of our country. Our parties and partisans are drifting farther apart, with many beginning to talk of irreconcilable differences. Our tax code is broken. We’re 18 trillion in debt and still deficit spending. And the culture of Washington is to not talk to the other side.
Isakson understands he is unfortunately unique in his willingness to reach across an aisle. But he’s always willing to talk. He’s also demonstrated he’s willing to walk away from the table rather than sign on to a bad deal for the sake of making any deal. He also knows that if he decides to no longer serve, he then has to ask who, if anyone, will work beyond talking points and get us back on track.
I didn’t leave angry. I left ready to re-enlist and continue the fight. I know that he will fight as long as he can.
His answer is that he has six more years left of fight in him. They will get physically harder every day, and he is well aware of that. I’m willing to stand behind him every one of those days.
Why? It’s much more than the personal feelings I’ve tried to express above. The Senate is a unique institution as crafted by our founders. It is a body where seniority and relationships determine what gets done and how it will get done.
Georgia has been deficient in Seniority for a couple of decades. We are a state of Russell’s and Nunn’s. We’ve had a sitting Speaker of the House. Isakson now chairs two committees and is the go-to guy when solutions are needed. He’s the guy that can put a Georgia accent on policy that comes through a Republican Congress.
Seniority matters. Experience matters. And the ability to close a deal matters.
Isakson knows the road ahead of him will not get any easier. He’s choosing to stay and fight despite this. May God bless him and his family through this fight, as he continues to fight for us.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Charlie, in some ways you and I are alike. But in some, we are different.
To you, loyalty is everything to our elected superstars. It is pretty much the full gravitas of your support ethic. You don’t give it often but you do give it to those who have spent the most time around you. You see the Senior Senator as a superstar of politics.
To me, the gloves come off when the swearing in is over. They are there for a purpose. And the purpose you proport, that is, Senator Isakson’s desire to ‘fix’ things on his arbitrary level of fixxin’ vision, does not quite match the vision of GA that many of us he is also supposed to represent.
I missed the diagnosis news, it must have been quiet and you have to give the Barksdale camp and the Blue Dogs credit for not making it an issue (it should be. The fine line between the stresses of being a Senator and POTUS is very. Concerns over Her Majesty’s potential Parkinson’s are legit. That extends to any leadership. Too often we have seen men propped up past their physical abilities, votes quietly cast by aides and not the person, etc.)
So, Rick, am I being worse case? Histrionics? Well, isn’t that par for the course of this election?
Besides being part of the obstructionist bloc of the GOP for the past 6 years, what has the good Senator done FOR Georgia, other than keep Marietta-Martin happy with bloated JTF contracts?
I’m sure I’d have a more rosy opinion of the man if I had been awed by his performance that day. What you went through – it’s just another political stage, the office; drapes, desk, where you sit, where he sits. It is designed to awe. And it sticks with you to this day. Massive mental impact.
Think about that….
The best thing I like about you, Charlie, besides your droll humor, is your ability to tolerate other opinions, unless they are way off base. Then you cut to the meta of wrongness and move on.
Democrats like Nunn, Johnson and Turner support the incumbent. You are in good company, at least.
Carry on and see you at the polls! 😀
Temerity would be Isakson standing by his every nominee deserves an up or down vote statement.
What’s bold or audacious about a Republican seeking to open debate on gun legislation with the goal of GOP political gain?