How You Got Trump, -Georgia Tuition Edition
Coursing through social media and other venues of public conversation comes the phrase “that’s how you got Trump,” most often used to criticize the elites, insiders, politicos and members of the media who still seem unaware of their role in contributing to the disaffection and despair of the Americans who voted for him. Only mostly white, only mostly rural, and only mostly male, the Trump bloc has a populist’s impatience with nuance and a reactionary hostility to the accepted social norms that defined them as second-class Americans. The recent decision by a Fulton County Superior Court Judge to allow children of illegal immigrants to attend Georgia colleges at tuition rates formerly reserved for American-born Georgia residents, and the reaction to it, is a perfect example of how we got Trump.
Judge Gail Tusan’s legal reasoning is fairly straightforward. Georgia’s Board of Regents gives students from Georgia in-state tuition rates –about a third the rate of what students from North Carolina, Tennessee or Alabama would pay to attend a Georgia college. A 2008 law (and Board of Regents Policy) limits that financial advantage to students who are “legally in this state.” Until Friday, that phrase didn’t include illegal immigrants who were brought here as children, and then included in the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. The judge found that since the federal government has deferred deportation hearings, the students are “legally in this state,” and therefore eligible for in-state tuition. Judge Tusan’s ruling means the federal definition of “lawful presence” supersedes any state law or University System of Georgia policy, and while the DACA kids aren’t citizens, USG will charge them tuition rates as if they were.
As a descriptor of the issues and emotions that drove 2016, the decision couldn’t be more apt. Tuition has increased by obscene percentages, and college is still out of reach for many, despite (or because of) efforts to make it more affordable through grants, low-interest student loans, and the HOPE scholarship. A college degree is still the best chance for most Americans to get ahead, and Trump voters understand instinctively that college admission is a zero-sum game –every slot filled by the child of an illegal immigrant (or anyone else) is one fewer slot available for their own child. Tolerating illegal immigrants is one thing, but sacrificing your kids’ future for theirs is unacceptable.
On his facebook page, State Senator Josh McKoon posted a question: “A Judge in Fulton County just required Georgia Colleges & Universities to offer taxpayer subsidized in state tuition to illegal aliens. Should the Georgia Legislature act to reverse this judge’s decision?” Before trying to unpack the deliberately loaded rhetoric from that question, it’s worth seeing the hundreds of reactions, replies and comments, which range from thoughtful frustration to spittle-flecked, all-caps rage. Dismissing this anger as only racism or xenophobia is lazy and inaccurate. There’s a reactionary tone to the debate, but also a sense of righteousness, of standing up to a bully. Trump voters aren’t mad at the immigrants per se, but they are furious beyond reason with a federal system that enables illegal immigration and appears to give them a leg up at the expense of American citizens.
Legislative action on the tuition issue will be forthcoming –it’s political catnip. The media coverage and public debate, if honest, will focus on the hard question of why we’re giving discounted tuition to anyone, rather than the facile “xenophobe vs. usurper” name calling contests of the past. Those contests don’t merely prevent empathy and solutions, they’re how you get Trump.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
“A college degree is still the best chance for most Americans to get ahead, and Trump voters understand instinctively that college admission is a zero-sum game –every slot filled by the child of an illegal immigrant (or anyone else) is one fewer slot available for their own child.”
Except it isn’t. Enrollment in the University System of Georgia is increasing, and, thus, is not a zero-sum game.
Fall 2006 USG Enrollment: 259,945
Fall 2015 USG Enrollment: 318,164
UGA, Georgia Tech, and Georgia State have all increased enrollment during that time frame as well. If enrollment were held steady, then it would be a zero-sum game. Instead, as more students become qualified to attend college, more students attend college.
Source: http://www.usg.edu/research/enrollment_reports
An increase in system capacity of 6400+/- per year doesn’t change zero-sum aspect. Acceptance rate at UGA is about 50%. At GA Tech it’s about 25%. If my kid getting in takes that year’s slot that your kid could have had, that’s a zero-sum game.
But thats the thing. What makes you sure your kid could have had it. KID A having better scores, letters of reference, and extracurriculars than Kid B means it can not be zero sum. Kid A did not take the slot from Kid B. It never belonged to either one. Because on the whole the kids arent the same and the qualifications arent the same (for the most part). This isnt a everyone who has a 1600 on the SATs gets in as long as there are spots available. Admissions at the Tier 1 schools (and sometimes the Tier 2) do not work like that.
Lea, I used admissions to explain the “zero-sum” aspect of it, but it’s just as much about affordability. There are a finite number of slots for admission to any college in any one year. If I’m a marginal applicant (for either academic OR financial reasons) and I know that a slot that goes to a DACA kid could have gone to me, I’m going to resent it. If I know that college is going to be a financial struggle for me a slot is made more affordable for a DACA kid, I’m going to resent that as well. I believe that if people didn’t feel that something was being taken from them, they wouldn’t have that resentment.
resentment can arise for many reasons- jealousy being #1. something was taken from them? as if they are entitled to a spot? no, it was a spot, they didn’t get it, for whatever reason. and there are plenty of reasons- fair and unfair- why someone would get a spot. it sounds like the resentment is the result of inability to process the results of a competitive world.
Except this decision isn’t about admissions, it’s about the tuition they pay once they’re in. Nothing prevents illegal aliens from applying to and attending GA universities. So theoretically, that spot was already taken. Our universities have lots of international students, many of whom don’t plan to stay and contribute to this state once they’ve graduated.
While you may be right in your understanding of the thinking behind these reactions, I think it’s still based on a sense of entitlement.
In other words, “It’s not fair, so we should not do it.”
Is that the gist of the argument?
We have a similar situation with Ga. drivers licenses. Federal courts forced Arizona to issue licenses to DACA individuals while the status in Georgia is unclear. Hopefully a DACA policy statement from the new administration, once they take office, will resolve the matter.
It is humorous to see dems link any policy that attempts to restrict illegal immigration with “hate” and deportation.
The reason Trump won the election is because the Democrats nominated an awful candidate who ran an even more awful campaign.
The reason why tuition in Georgia has skyrocketed is due to HOPE. Sure, tuitions have gone up across the nation but the political dynamics are different in each state. I seriously doubt that without the HOPE buffer, Georgia residents would have gotten along fine with such insane increases.
Frankly, I don’t see a problem with children getting educations. These immigrants had no control about being brought here and now they are supposed to pay out-of-state rates? If they get into a spot a UGA or Tech, etc and one of our kids doesn’t then tough crap; our kids will just have to learn deal with it. I believe in merit-based admissions and in all honestly, we’re not talking about a huge pool of actual candidates.
This Federal system which enables illegal immigration you speak of was lobbied for by business interests.
There is a nativist aspect to this debate, whether or not you choose to acknowledge it.
So, they are wrong.
But telling them they are wrong does not bring any advantage and in fact, reaffirming their wrongness actually creates political advantage. One side has figured that out.
That’s how you get Trump.