Liberals Target Tom Price With Smear Tactics
Because he’s Donald Trump’s nominee to head the department of Health and Human Services, and the author of the best plan with which to replace Obamacare, Kaiser Health News has set its sights on stopping Rep. Tom Price. With tactics that would make Joseph McCarthy blush and Joseph Goebbels beam with pride, Kaiser Health News is loading headlines and ledes with shameful innuendo to derail Price’s confirmation -even though the implications of headline and the lede are undone by the any facts that find their way into the articles.
In normal times, it would be a lot of fun to watch Marisa Taylor and Christina Jewett, a pair of seemingly talented journalists, beclown themselves trying to use propaganda as truth. But in the post-fact era of information overload, first impressions -from headlines or summaries or quick scans- are the things that form public impressions. Since Kaiser Health News is a service that encourages republication of its disinformation, their work is being dutifully parroted by two of the the Democrats’ best online marketing brochures, Buzzfeed and Huffington Post, and mainstream media should be regurgitating it soon. It’s not quite “fake” news, but it is fake perception, designed to spread a viral presentation of semi-facts in the way that does the most damage to the target.
In the latest example, after pointing out that Price has long criticized federal spending as “excessive,” Taylor and Jewett level a hypocrisy implication: “Yet during his years in Congress, he’s worked hard to keep federal dollars flowing to his most generous campaign donors.” Their description though, is of a Congressman who works very hard to represent the folks who sent him to Congress.
“Price has been a go-to congressman, a review of his records show, for medical special interests hotly sparring with regulators or facing budget cuts. Over the past decade, he has waded into issues related to specific drugs and medical devices, making 38 inquiries with the federal Food and Drug Administration, according to federal records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. He questioned the FDA on his constituents’ behalf about matters as minute as a device for fertility treatment and an ingredient in pain creams.” (Emphasis added)
When the innuendo is distilled out of the reporting, Rep. Price is accused of looking out for his constituents and trying to protecting some of their business interests from regulations and budgets cuts, even on little things. If that’s true, we need a Constitutional amendment requiring 434 other members of the House of Representatives do exactly that. That’s. Why. We. Elected. Them.
In support of their scurrilous efforts, Taylor and Jewett pull a fairly standard quotation from Ross Baker, but get him to say this:
A meat ax? In the dark of night? That kind of rhetoric is over the top, but the kind of thing you expect from a professor teaching at a university as scandal-plagued as Rutgers, who’s also the “Scholar in Residence in the Office of the Democratic Leader of the U.S. Senate,” and a “consultant to the Democratic caucus of the U.S. House of Representatives.”
See what I did there? I don’t know Ross Baker, and he might not be a doctrinaire partisan at a corrupt institution renting his dwindling academic credibility in the service of defamatory attacks. But we can’t be sure of that, can we?
The Affordable Care Act has been described as President Obama’s “signature” legislation -the one act that will define his Presidency. As such, it will be the what the Democrats defend the hardest. And as the person most qualified to undo it, Tom Price is going to draw most of the Democrats’ attacks. Starting today, Democrats will open their standard, stale playbook to page 1, and accuse the Attorney General nominee, Republican Jeff Sessions, of racism. Rex Tillerson’s probably going to be Secretary of State, but not before an organized effort to smear him as Vladimir Putin’s stooge who poisons aquifers and hunts Pandas. But the longest knives are being sharpened for Tom Price, who’s being smeared as a crook in order to protect Obama’s legacy.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Comparing liberals to Nazis in the first paragraph? We don’t even need a comments section anymore!
Physician Price has been in majority party House leadership for years and many of the 50+ votes repealing Obamacare in the 2,000 plus days since its enactment.
That his “best plan” never got a Committee vote is testament to the best the GOP can do.
Mentioning Goebbels when Trump’s Chief Strategist is white nationalist Bannon is rich. The rube base will eat it up.
Hassenger makes references to Nazi figures and some here start hyperventilating? Really? Where was your outrage when Trump supporters were called Fascists and Nazis? Nary a peep in defending their honor. Didn’t fit the narrative, I guess.
The difference is that the so-called “alt-right,” one of the loudest groups to support Trump, is an actual white supremacist/neo-Nazi group.
Calling liberals who want thorough investigations Nazis is wholly different.
Why of course it is, Robbie! Of course it is…! If you say so!
“Smearing through insinuation” = “wanting a thorough investigation?” Thanks for emphasizing my point.
Still not comparable to the Nazis, though. McCarthy perhaps, but not the Nazis. I’m pretty sure my grandparents would agree.
So you agree that this is a McCarthy style witch hunt. That’s good to know.
Mostly I’m saying the Nazi reference was completely inappropriate for a website that aims to take the high road and have meaningful discussions instead of mudslinging.
So now you are back tracking.
IF that’s “inappropriate,” then Kaiser Health News should stop using Nazi propaganda tactics. KHN claims to be “…a nonprofit news service committed to in-depth coverage of health care policy and politics,” but what they’re doing is attempting to create the public impression that Tom Price has done something illegal. That’s a smear, and it’s wrong. And it IS one of the things the Nazis did.
You could get the exact same point across by saying, “unacceptable smear tactics.” You could invoke many, many other groups who also engaged in deep propaganda, like the US Government, even. The Nazis did a lot more than just smearing people, and in this day and age – specifically, this day and age – you’re either being willfully ignorant of the sharp rise in anti-Semitism, the alt-right, and white nationalism, or purposefully playing into that.
16 Jewish Community Centers had bomb threats made against them yesterday, and very close friends and family have been the target of anti-Semitic harassment and terror across the country in recent weeks – many of the incidents making national headlines. To blithely throw around Nazi comparisons mocks all of that.
Comparing an ugly confirmation battle to mass genocide is abhorrent and unacceptable.
It would be, if I had done that. But I didn’t.
i can’t even believe the comparison to Geobbels was made, and that there’s even a smidgeon of an attempt to justify it. Sorry, but it speaks loudly loudly loudly of ignorance. And reckless disregard for real threats in the world.
You want to make a point abt propaganda? OK. But words, and information are means to an end. Your point is that those journalist’s words have an improper end- which is to unjustly malign the reputation of a political figure. Fine. But Goebbel’s end- was mass extinction of Jews. Kill innocent human beings one by one in the most horrific manners.
Your point- now becomes lost and tarnished. Not only is it ineffective “journalism” but it is reckless disregard for the actual threats of anti-Semitism that exists. As is the defense of any integration or normalization of Nazi references. If your family had endured Nazi murder and slaughter, and survived modern American anti-Semitic attacks, you would understand that it leaves those of us with such experiences to fight against such casual reckless disregard for human life with every ounce of our will to keep our families safe. Surely you would respect the desire to keep families safe from the influence of those who would threaten and attack it if it it were normalized to do so?
So, for the love of God, just stop it with the Nazi references when there are no actual Nazis or neo-Nazis involved. It’s that simple. The otherwise improper use of Nazi references and their defense creates a hostile atmosphere on this blog, and I would again request that our kind Editors ask the contributors to be aware and edit such content. There is literally infinite other ways to get the point across. Unfortunately, the Goebbels reference reduced the validity of the article by a seriously significant degree.
Good to know, Robbie. So, you have that same feeling when other front page posters on here have referred to American voters who supported Trump as Nazis? True or not?
I wish bethebalance would get as worked up over someone ACTUALLY USING Nazi tactics as he (or she) has over my pointing it out.
Double down. Double down.
Just say you made a mistake and be done with it.
Go on, admit using propaganda techniques and willfully calling people Nazis is bad. Remember “To blithely throw around Nazi comparisons mocks all of that. Comparing an ugly confirmation battle to mass genocide is abhorrent and unacceptable.”
C’mon CC. Calling names is bad, isn’t it?
i get worked up on every issue of genocide or advocacy for genocide, or normalization of advocacy for genocide. Really, any murder. But political mud slinging is just mud. It’s not Sarin gas.
Good lord, nobody here has ever done any such thing. The discussion is the wrongful use of propaganda techniques. Stay focused.
exactly. it’s the normalization of Nazism that creates actual ignorance and emboldens actual anti-Semitism. it is an indirect threat, but a threat nonetheless. i don’t know what else i can do to help understanding.
You could condemn Kaiser Health News for using their techniques? Just a thought.
dodge. dip. duck. dodge.
not the issue.
but their piece looks like typical political advocacy piece. i may have missed it, but i didn’t see anyone calling him genocidal, or advocate for murder or genocide.
i’ll just have to leave the convo with a prayer for your understanding, bc i believe your better understanding would bring better dialogue to this site and to the issues it discusses.
I pray you will learn to read for comprehension someday, because I too believe your better understanding would bring better dialogue to this site and to the issues it discusses.
No hyperventilating…one just discounts everything written after that and its entertainment only (if it rises to that level). Not a particularly good way to get a point across.
Tom Price’s plan is about to get more than a committee hearing. It’s about to get enacted into law.
And I think Harry Reid for Tom Price’s confirmation along with Devos, Kelly, Tillerson, Chao and on and on. Thank you Harry for allowing us to get true reformers into a position of power instead of watered down managers. Thank you thank you.
What we need is true leadership, someone to set the tone and set the bar a little higher than it has been before. Someone to lead by example and inspire us to all be better.
Oh wait….
Yes we need someone that will have beer summits and draw red lines in the sand and dare the world to cross them. Then draw another line and dare the world to cross it. Then another line. That’s what we need.
Oh wait……….
The left has embraced McCarthyism. This is just the latest sample.
pot…meet kettle. Yes you are both black…deal with it
Disregarding the excessive troll nature of your writing, you were right to point out that Tom Price is there to represent his constituents, DRUG MAKERS AND MEDICAL DEVICE COMPANIES.
Not the folks that live in the 6th district per se, but DRUG MAKERS AND MEDICAL DEVICE COMPANIES.
Just how the founders intended.
Click a link, idiot. The article itself refers to the medical businesses IN. THE. DISTRICT. Imagine a medical business being headquartered in the 6th CD.
Thanks for the name-calling, sir. Diving into articles links you’ll see in the FOIA requests, they note b(6) or b(4) as ‘constituents’. Finding out who b(4) is, you’ll see its Magellan Services LLC, or Magellan Health. The company is headquartered in Arizona and unless I’m wrong, doesn’t have an office in the metro Atlanta area.
I don’t take a Buzzfeed article at face-value, neither should you.
Hmmm, seems there are quite a few clinics in the metro area. So I guess you are wrong. How dare Tom Price look out for health providers as a Doctor and Congressman. How dare he!!!
http://www.yellowpages.com/atlanta-ga/magellan-health-services-inc
You’re sort of blurring the lines of crony capitalism. If a congressmen is bankrolled by JPM you’d probably say they’re close to “Wall Street”, not just “looking out for the local Chase branch”.
Every free-trader’s just looking out for their local Wal-mart, etc.
But I do appreciate that at least you called me “Mr.”
I may be snarky and over caffeinated this morning, but I was raised in the South. It’s always Mr. and Mrs.
With that said, it is crazy to believe that a Congressman who is a doctor and has spent his entire political career working on healthcare would not help a company who has multiple facilities in Atalanta? Come one man.
Just like my reference to planned parenthood below that you liberals refuse to address. Where is planned parenthood based? How many democrats fight tooth and nail for them to receive federal funding. I’d you to articulate how that is different.
I know if I disagree with you then I’m basically a pinko-commie liberal, but that’s not the case. I’m a pro-energy, pro-defense moderate, but getting that out of the way, I’ll address President Nixon’s funding of PP.
Federal funds aren’t used to “chop of babies”, as you so eloquently put it. But I know you fascists (see, I can do it too) claim that just frees up private money for them to perform the procedure. President Nixon wanted to ensure that families had access to quality family-planning care (contraceptives, screenings, etc.) regardless of income-levels, so that’s why he promoted federal funding for PP.
I don’t have a strong opinion one way or another regarding its federal funding, so I’m not going to hem and haw about it. If quality family-planning services are encouraged under Dr. Price’s soon-to-be enacted plan, then I support that.
Many things have changed since President Nixon was in office four decades ago. Including what Planned Parenthood currently does. All funds are fungible and you know this. Planned Parenthood is in the business of killing babies. Not mammograms or handing out condoms like it did in the 1970s.
Abortion is legal. Legal.
If PP is providing abortion, it is not breaking the law. Why defund a legal act?
While it may me legal, it is also illegal to use taxpayer dollars to perform abortions. They receive millions of dollars a year in taxpayer dollars. If you can’t see that there is a problem with that then you are blinded with partisanship or stupidity. I can’s say which.
Because that oh so saintly act literally kills babies. Any other reason necessary?
Be nice to Walmart. If Price guts the healthcare system as he has an extensive paper trail backing it up that says so, Grandma is going to need to keep working there till she is 90 at least.
You’re wrong: http://www.manta.com/c/mm0wwmb/magellan-health-services-inc
And again, it’s NOT a “Buzzfeed” article. It’s a Kaiser Health News hit-piece disguised as an article.
Once again another liberal whining. This is going to be soooooo fun.
Tom Price was protecting his constituents from harmful regulations and a gigantic bureaucratic nightmare so that these people were able to better help people with higher quality healthcare. And you wonder why the cost of healthcare is so high. Getting approvals from the FDA has nothing to do with it, right???
Just like the democrats protect Planned Parenthood’s right to murder babies with federal dollars. Tom Price has tried to help drug makers and medical device companies get product to market quicker so that they can save lives. Not chop up babies.
Yep, I’m going to have fun with this. Zero work is getting done today.
This was in response to Mr. Fitz. Clicked the wrong reply button I guess.
If this is the level of posting that I can expect in the future, this page will cease to be of any use at all. An appalling use of language, insinuation, insult by Hassinger.
Address the issues and leave the Nazis where they are-in the White House.
I did address the issue. The issue is that a liberal “news service” is using propaganda techniques to falsely accuse Tom Price of doing something illegal. I point that out explicitly, without any insinuation. Sort of like your explicit insult about Nazis in the White House.
Is that an utter lack of self-awareness, or are you being sarcastic?
There are Nazis in the White House.
To this country’s everlasting shame.
Everyone wants to cut spending until it affects their donors, their military base, their special interest buddies. Tom Price is no different. But if he crossed the ethical and criminal lines, better to investigate and find out now. You know-journalism. Try some, Mike.
Like the journalists that looked into Hillary’s illegal server and Nancy Pelosi’s illegal stock trades?
Keep on whining.
Are we talking about them? No we are not.
Take your ADHD med and get back to us.
I can do multiple things at once. Like walk and chew gum.
I’ve actually been a journalist. I know how to report. I also know propaganda smears when I see them, and Kaiser Health News is engaged in a propaganda smear against Tom Price.
You might not like Price. You might not like his plan. You might not like the President-elect who has nominated him. But letting his nomination be derailed by an orchestrated series of false accusations is just cowardice.
And I should add: “To blithely throw around Nazi comparisons mocks all of that. Comparing an ugly confirmation battle to mass genocide is abhorrent and unacceptable.”
You also, it appears, know how to write them. You didnt even try very hard…as I said below somewhere, check the Washington Examiner…you’re a perfect fit…along with Jenny Beth Martin who pens a propaganda piece of her own every now and then (another gifted writer with an added self enrichment bonus…and thats some heavy sarcasm there if you missed it)
Yet no where in your piece do you say that. You mention its not really “fake news” but I dont recall where you said they were accusing him of doing things illegally…I could be wrong of course
I’m neutral on Hassinger but when a fit-z starts by calling him an excessive troll, what follows is severely discounted.
The current Obama/Hillary talked one way and behaved with hate, removing hope from the productive and devisiveness as a key tactic.
Pushback now should be hell on the left McCartyites.
But your “level of posting” is useful?! Characterizing Trump as a Nazi? Rich…
Did I say Trump> I did not. Bannon and his ilk are Nazis. All they need are some jack boots.
Back to Tom Price. He is not qualified to be head of HHS. His ACA Replace Plan is unworkable.
“Back to Tom Price. He is not qualified to be head of HHS. His ACA Replace Plan is unworkable.” Says who? You? Okay.
Orthopedic Surgeon for over 20 year.
Started one of the largest orthopedic surgery groups in the country
Professor at Emory
First Republican Majority Leader in Georgia since reconstruction
Congressman that has authored multiple healthcare bills
Has fought FDA and CMS over regulation for years
Budget Chairman
Okay, you got me. He ain’t qualified to work on healthcare. Do you honestly know how dumb your statement was?
Price not qualified? You tried this once before CC and failed to explain how a doctor who has spent years working to end the failed ACA program lacks qualification. Especially when compared with the previous leaders of HHS like the two political appointees we endured over the past 8 years – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services
One could easily argue that Tom Price is the MOST qualified nominee to lead this department since Dr. Louis Sullivan. Instead of just spewing mindless dem talking points CC, try actually doing a little research first. You never know, you might one day enlighten us with an intelligent post.
Maybe Nazi is off base but fascist isn’t. Look it up.
I don’t quite know where to start (as usual) but having perused for the first time the KHN about us page (or ever really hearing about them) I think it’s quite a reach to call them liberals but then again, they’re reporters…ipso facto ergo sum I suppose?
Anyway, Mike: could you please share your database of news outlets’ partisanship? I can’t keep up but thank you for your service in doing so.
No.
Since the Democrats went with the “Nuclear Option” doing away with 60% to kill a filibuster all of this is moot. Trump’s team and family knew this going in with these cabinet picks and perhaps their picks would have been different without knowing the fix is in. A couple of Republican Senators would have to break ranks and I don’t see that happening on Price. Sessions is also a slam dunk being a member of the club to boot and his is the one pick that could ensure the pendulum swings back in the next cycle.
I don’t know if it is the infamous attention spans of GenX and millennials with soundbite mentalities but hardly anyone in US politics plays the long game anymore.
No. But I’m glad to know you support me in criticizing Kaiser Health News for their misleading propaganda efforts. Welcome to the struggle!
You libs can bust Mike up with all of you faux Nazi indignation but in about a week ‘ol Price is gonna be the Secretary!! Lol! To quote to former the Rapist in Chief, ” I feel your pain…”
Seems the main comment I made on this was removed without any explanation (also cached pages were deleted…nice touch). If the proprietors of this website dont want thought out disagreement, well, its a free country. Just know that my comment was censored without reason or explanation. I mentioned the first name of someone as a comparison to the writing style here…leaving out the last name on purpose. Other than that it just says that Mike engages in the exact practice he says he finds offensive, while not mentioning the REAL reasons Price should never be in the position of HHS.
If you cant take criticism…live in your happy little bubble. It wont serve you very well in the long term.
If you cant tell, this really is irritating. This piece deserves to be called what it is…bad. I’m sorry that runs counter to what is “allowed”. I challenge you to reinstate the comment and if you want to redact what ran against policy feel free. You probably wont, and that is really a sad state of affairs.
You do nobody any service this way. I liked occasionally visiting. Charlie…I know you are better than that