Whoops Dems Did It Again
The following is a guest Op-Ed from LaDawn “LBJ” Jones. She is a former Democratic state representative from South Fulton County, a local attorney, and my frequent sparring partner as a political analyst for 11Alive in Atlanta.
I would like to be the first to congratulate President Trump on his 2020 re-election. My condolences to the United States of America and the Democratic National Committee. This bold prediction comes after my review of the schedule for the DNC Convention in Atlanta. It is clear from the list of meetings that the leadership learned absolutely nothing from Trump’s November win.
After the general pleasantries of registration, general session and budget discussions, the schedule lists a plethora of caucuses and councils that have a glaring missing component. See if you can pick it out: rural council, Native council, disability council, LGBT Caucus, North/South/East/West caucuses, Asian American Pacific Islanders caucus, women’s caucus, black caucus, Hispanic caucus, military council, senior council and youth council.
Excuse me DNC, where does a middle aged white male who lives in an urban community get a chance to discuss his concerns for the country and work on a strategy to address those issues? Asked another way, when is the next Republican committee election? This is what they meant when they said, “Trump spoke to my issues.”
From the looks of the schedule, the DNC folks are either still in shell shock from November 8th or they truly do not get it. Listen, we understand, in comparison it would appear that the group of individuals that need the least amount of strategy is the group that historically has had the most advantages. However, since when did having the least amount of problems to address mean the same as having no problems at all?
It is true, if we reduce our unemployment or fix our healthcare ALL Americans benefit including white Americans. Yet being the incidental beneficiary of policy that was created with everyone else in mind feels pretty crappy. Trust me, I wear a size ten shoe, which apparently is larger than the average woman’s foot. When I shoe shop, I’m annoyed that cute and colorful shoes in my size are an afterthought. I get stuck wearing black pumps all the time. Democrats, stop leaving out women with big feet! I mean white men.
It will take a courageous white man to stand up and say this thought out loud. No choice of words can avoid the guaranteed, “how dare he” followed by a review of indigenous genocide, the middle passage, and John Lewis on the Edmond Pettis Bridge. This should not be a fight about who had it worse and therefore whose issues are more important. Trump is our President; we all have it worse and all our issues are important.
Amazingly, although their input is not sought, we have no problem throwing out the phrase like it’s a four-letter word when we discuss, “THE white man.” Giving them a place to discuss their issues allows Democrats to take the more progressive stance that acknowledges – they are not all the descendants of slave owners or the brothers to cops who use excessive force on black men. Even those who are descendants of slave owners deserve some say so (after they do the pledge that begins, “the confederate flag is not heritage” and the secret dance that goes along with it.)
What are white guy issues? I don’t know. I’m a black woman from the south side of Atlanta who owns lots of black pumps. Have a meeting and find out. Someone is thinking, Congress and State Legislatures across the country are made up of mostly white men. That is true. However, it is those things that make the men on Capitol Hill different from your average middle aged white male that you are missing. You learned and focused in on the other interest groups solutions by making time for them. You must make time for the white guy caucus.
We are seeing the unintended consequences of policies of inclusion. If the DNC cannot think of a way to be inclusive to Caucasian progressives without making the minority groups feel shunned – we are doomed to eight years with the peach colored POTUS. We cannot be the party of inclusion and diversity by excluding white men and their diverse perspective on this country.
The good news is that President Trump will have tons more press conferences over the next four years. We can win back some of his voters. They will not admit it but they are cringing at the same television we are yelling at. Our President will make it so easy that even if we just dangle a black pump dressed up with a little strap and clearance sticker, we can get them back by listening to their concerns at the same level as the other concerns and not as an afterthought. All a woman wants is a cute strap.
If it makes you feel more warm and fuzzy give the white male caucus a cute name like the “historic caucus,” “majorities within minorities caucus,” or simply, “white dudes caucus.” The only other thing we can do to put the final nail in the coffin is to select a DNC chair that does not strike the proper tone and ingenuity to this issue exposed by the Trump campaign. Trump is the gorilla glue holding the Democratic Party together for now. It would be the definition of insanity to think doing the exact same thing again will get you a different result.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Dear Ms. Jones,
I’m a middle-aged straight white dude. I’m also highly educated, so maybe you’re not talking to me.
But I admittedly live a comfortable life, and I see myself aligning with the Democratic Party not because they speak to my personal issues, but because they speak to the issues of social justice and equality under the law that the Republican Party does not. I *want* my personal issues disregarded, to some extent. I *want* a party that speaks out for the marginalized and oppressed, and doesn’t throw out the “pull up by your own bootstraps” canard.
I am opposed to self-flagellation.
Jones said it well.
Dear Ms. Jones – the DNC will have to do more than have a caucus that includes us old white guys. The party is gonna have to listen and move to the middle where us old white guys reside. Two thirds of the DNC agenda items we don’t care about so you can boot about half the stupid agendas, keep a third of the stupid agendas and probably capture a lot of old white guys. I’m certainly not shot in the butt with the republicans with a lot of their stupid agendas, and believe most of us have zero loyalty to the State republican party – just the democrats have left us no choice except to send our money and votes to the lesser evil. Step back and look at the line of agendas the democrats have pushed and ask yourself where that line intersects with us old white guys.
Us old white guys knew what we were getting when we voted for Trump [old white guys being the biggest block of Trump voters]; I know this is gonna surprise the the professional politicals on both sides of the aisle – but we are not surprised at the Trumps antics. We put him in charge not for his antics, but to correct the mess both parties have made to the government. And he is doing what the old white guys sent him to Washington to do. The issue is the republican legislators are getting left in Trump’s dust of action that we old guys want Trump to accomplish and we will hold those slow legislators accountable in elections for their failures to act. Trump on his worst day is far better than any vision I can conjur up of Clinton & Kain on their best day. Until the democrats can understand that ‘glue’ as you put it – it is a waste to try to pander to us old white guys. Give us a democratic candidate that will say expansion of government and expansion of taxation is past enough and we will turn on the republicans in office. Give us that and not the stupid agendas that have nothing to do with our lives and you will see the old white men vote democrat. Don’t be scared of us – be scared of going so far to the extreme you eradicate the party.
By the way – old white guys don’t care about things like pumps when it is our government we are talking about. We want solutions and not shoe fashion.
By the way – old white guys don’t care about things like pumps when it is our government we are talking about. We want solutions and not shoe fashion.
I thought it was an apt analogy but maybe that’s because I am also a ladies’ size 10.
Wow you’ve got big feet, Teri.
Well, they’re narrow, so it’s not as noticeable.
(Confidential to LBJ: Two words: Nordstrom Rack)
this post amuses me greatly. thanks for the entertainment.
Dear Ms. Jones – Let’s put it another way. If the republicans could not capture us old white guy’s money and votes with putting forward yokels like Jeb Bush [Bush had establishment & PAC money – not old white guys in the heartland money], or a Lindsay Graham [no money]…does not the DNC recognize you will never capture the old white guys living outside a few cities with the lunacy of agendas the party has put forth? We sat out the McCain fiasco and were amazed at the republicans offering us Romney – so why would we come home to the democrats with what you folks have offered us being even less palatable?
The democrats have got to give us old white guys candidates with solutions on issues we care about and not a theme of everyone is a victim of something.
I’m not into flagellation either (except for several left wingers on this site trying to make a buck off divisiveness or give mine away). The only thing she just heard was her pump flying by her head.
PS: Trump redo on immigration shows he listens and adjusts to get things done.
You forgot the part about undermining the judiciary with / and a series of petulant tweets.
what in the revisionist history??
his redo is because he got shot down by the courts. He had no choice but to redo. If he was interested in listening, he would have taken the time to have competent people write the order instead of hastily allowing those with no experience do it.
dude. you are stretch armstronging with that comment.
When bogged down it is business strategy 101. Done it successfully 9 out of 10 times. But then he has a lot of opposition from tenured motivated incompetents, the scariest of all types.
And he let Stephen Miller out yesterday to say it was basically just like the first order, giving state AG’s and immigration lawyers everywhere their base of argument. Mr. Miller needs to go back to working for his old boss, Sen. (sorry, AG) Sessions to correctly state his position (which he frankly has a legal footing for – if he just kept the foot out of his month..)
And the Dems offer Keith Ellison and Thomas Perez as leading candidates to “expand” the democrat party?
Plus a dark horse…
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/23/pete-buttigieg-democratic-party-chair-candidate
The Hilly/Burnie crowd want Perez/Ellison. I say Perez wins.
Most likely.
However; Buttitgieg has a lot of state party chairs and Howard Dean’s support, plus did extremely well at the debate last night. He’s from a conservative rust belt state, while being 2 time elected gay mayor of South Bend. As a said, the Dark Horse….
When the white farmers watch their crops rot for lack of immigrant stoop laborers
when the medical bills for granny and the kids and the wife come in with no insurance, no Medicaid, no ob/gyn in the county and no hospital for 50 miles
when the fishing stream turns black and gummy
when the kids come home crying inconsolably because their friend got beat up for being queer or different or Mexican
when the beach is covered with oil blobs and the shrimp are all dead
maybe then white men will realize the GOP does nothing, nothing! for them and start voting less for rhetoric and more for results.
As is your custom, your comment could be replaced by a giant whooshing sound.
You proudly post that, not realizing that Rep Jones’ words are aimed at messengers like you.
You keep at it though. While I didn’t vote for this President, I really am enjoying having both houses of Congress.
Has the crap hit the fan? No it has not. Just wait, Charlie. Just wait.
I like it!
“…on a message that was decidedly more progressive.”
As in, more liberal?
Progressive of course is in the eye of the beholder…
Hi folks, I wanted to wait a day and see the comments before announcing I am ‘that white guy’ that LBJ was talking about. If you want proof, go back to the end of July 2016, when I posted this lack of diversity issue at the DNCC.
I think most of you ‘got it.’ Really, most of you got the very specific points (except for those shoe fetishists and you know who you are! *wags finger*) that there are bigger issues that impact us all that are not addressed at the national level: criminal justice reform, harm reduction, pain pill mills, high suicide rates of white men age 55-64, and endless cycle of babies making babies, that grandparents are forced to raise, due to low educational opportunities, lack of hospitals in some areas, etc.
None of these things were offered to ‘mah demographic’. My point is that there (as many of you pointed out) is a disconnect between the national party and The Deplorables™ rural America. Ms. Jones accurately points this out, even though she does not understand our ‘needs’. We understand her needs, as a female and a person of color. We should all understand the common concerns we share. It brings us together.
Everyone has a vision for their country and everyone should have an equal opportunity to participate in making OUR nation a more perfect Union.
Thanks, LaDawn. You gave me and my concerns about inclusiveness a megaphone.