Serve The Patient, Serve The Student, Starve The Bureaucracy
This week’s Courier Herald column:
In my day job, I spend a good bit of time working on policy solutions in the areas of medicine and education, among other topics. They are complex areas, without singular problems nor singular silver-bullet solutions. The fields appear to have very little in common. And yet, many of the barriers to success in each field have a similar root cause.
My mother spent the first ten days of this year in the hospital. It was not a pleasant visit, not that hospital stays usual are. The information we received about her condition and reason for hospitalization was incomplete and contradictory. We had difficulty getting basic questions answered. All communication, we were told, was to come from the doctor. “The”, singular, doctor, who we saw for a couple of minutes per day. She eventually made it clear to us in no uncertain terms that she had already answered our questions and didn’t care to be asked again, nor to have her orders questioned.
After firmly requesting she be replaced by my mom’s doctor from a previous and very recent stay, that doctor said “Had I seen you on your first day here, you wouldn’t be here now”. By that point she had a new infection (that she predicted she would get on day 2 of her stay – a prediction doctor #1 ignored) and she remained in the hospital four more days.
My mother, a registered nurse, made it clear as my sisters and I worked the hospital’s bureaucracy that the nurses and techs were giving her great care and were very responsive to all her requests. That much was evident. And yet, despite all of their efforts to go above and beyond, the net effect of the first several days of her stay was that she was arguably worse off for having been there than not.
Mom understood a basic lesson of unaccountable bureaucracies. The people on the front lines – often the hardest working and lowest paid – are the first to get the blame. As such, she didn’t want to make a fuss. She was more worried about the blowback to the wrong people than her own health.
So what does this have to do with education? Nothing, except everything.
At the end of the day, hospitals exist to serve the patient. Period.
And yet, when there’s a problem or question, the bureaucracy must be served before the patient’s concern even begins to be addressed. Insurance reimbursements, state and federal regulations, policies designed to limit legal liability, and respect for internal hierarchies are routinely invoked as reasons to deny, delay, or otherwise obfuscate direct requests from patients – also known as the customer.
In education, the titles and situations are different, but the excuses are the same. The teachers are on the front line, yet they too suffer from burdensome state and federal regulations, policies to limit legal liability, and are at the bottom of the education hierarchy. They’re expected to work miracles, but if there’s a problem they’re the first to feel the heat.
In this case, the customer is the student. The needs of the student are far from the center of education policy these days. Whether in education, or in medicine, too often the needs of the bureaucracy must be served before those of the student or patient can be addressed.
Recently I had to help a friend pick out a nursing home. It’s amazing how different the patient-provider relationship is when an insurance company isn’t involved. Yes, there are still a lot of regulations governing quality and delivery. But there’s an amazing amount of flexibility and adaptability that providers are willing to offer when there is competition for the patient’s dollar – and a direct relationship between the buyer and seller. The prospective resident – and his needs – are front and center.
It’s refreshing to hear talk of healthcare reforms coming out of Washington to make healthcare more patient centered. Let’s hope there is reality behind the talk.
Let’s take this same lesson and apply it to education while we’re at it. Schools serve many functions beyond education these days. The least important among them is to serve as a jobs program for adults. Especially, for administrative bureaucrats. The priorities must be inverted to establish a direct relationship between the customer, and a provider that can and will meet their needs.
We must get education at all levels to be more student focused. The organizations that best serve their student customers need to be rewarded. If the needs of the students are put first, including funding based on student need, all of those other problems for the adults involved will end up taking care of themselves.
Charlie Harper is the publisher of GeorgiaPol.com and the Executive Director of PolicyBEST, which focuses on policy issues of Business Climate, Education, Science & Medicine, and Transportation.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You are correct in stating that the underlying issue with both health care and education is that the “customer” is unable to get basic information about the price and value of the services being offered. Just last week I tried to get comparison prices for an MRI only to be told I had to have an appointment and come in so the providers could consult with my insurance company before I could be given an estimate. These appointments aren’t free either.
Parents can’t question the cost or value of the education that their child is receiving and they can’t comparison shop because there is little or no competition. And as a practical matter, if a school fails to educate a child the parents don’t have any recourse (see APD cheating scandal).
A good first step in reform would be to force healthcare providers and educators to disclose the cost for the services they provide up front. A second step would be to empower the customer to “shop” around for the best deal for the money. I understand that healthcare is complicated by the issue of emergency conditions which require immediate treatment but most healthcare is not emergency care.
One of the problems with the ACA is that consumers that got the subsidy were limited to plans within the exchanges. The proposed Repub plan will allow consumers to use their tax credit with any provider.
The only problem with that is that they are not providing nearly the amount needed to purchase coverage if you are on the lower half of the income scale. The link below has charts that show this. Also you will pay more for less coverage since the floor standards will be dropped (and it will be more difficult to really know what you are getting). 350,000 people will lose coverage under the GOP plan in GA alone. Thats going to be a big problem if they go through with this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/04/opinion/tax-credits-are-no-substitute-for-obamacare.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
Also, I’m sorry your mother is ill, and the doctor you spoke to…her attitude is unacceptable and you should tell her that (and if you can switch to another doctor…do it). I unfortunately have a lot of experience with medical care and I dont put up with it. Like you said, the doctor is there for the patient (or their advocate). You dont let her leave till you are satisfied. Look at the chart. If you have questions I find its good to write them down when you think of them.
As for education…I am not quite comfortable calling kids “customers” because “success” is sometimes hard to quantify. Smart kids sometimes dont test well, and I think our education system is skewed to test score results. We need a better way than that.
Some folks want less coverage. For instance, a woman who won’t have children doesn’t need child birth coverage. Similarly a non drinker/ non drug user doesn’t want substance abuse coverage.
Subsidies and premiums should be based on age because older folks use more health care services. More young folks will purchase insurance if their cost is much less than what oldsters pay.
That’s all well and good until the young un wraps his car around a tree, develops testicular cancer, goes schizophrenic, develops appendicitis, etc etc. Insurance is shared risk.
The young aren’t always cheaper.
Insurance is based on shared risk but the sharing should be proportional to the projected use. Every study I have seen says on average young folks use less health care services than oldsters.
In reply to Scott: Yes, part of the problem with it taking 5+ days to remove the doctor was that there was a rotation between my sisters and me. It took 3 days to figure out what we didn’t know/weren’t being told, my little sister ran the traps on day 4 and organized and asked all the questions (and got few answers), and I was there on day 5 when the doctor came into Mom’s room (after I had been asking every other medical professional on duty the questions, only to be referred to the doctor on duty), only to have the doctor literally roll her eyes while standing in the doorway of the room and insist to me that she had already answered all of our questions yesterday, to my sister. When pushed, she said this two more times. She refused to answer questions my mom had about the mix of meds with fluid restriction (thus causing the infection), to state why mom was on a fluid restriction beyond “she’s a cardiac patient”, but then continued to push back against both a cardiac consult and a pulmonology consult, this despite Mom having both of those doctors from the same hospital on a visit just six weeks earlier.
She was rudely dismissive of everything mom or I had to say, and only appeared to be in the room to assert that she knew what she was doing, and she didn’t care to continue to be bothered with our questions. We made sure she wasn’t. I found the nurse manager and informed her that this doctor wasn’t to see my mother again nor be involved in her care, and if that was a problem we needed discharge papers. We were assigned that doctor’s supervisor, who then ordered the two consults we had been asking for since day 3. It was the pulmonologist that told mom the next morning that she shouldn’t be there. Nice.
Bigger problem? This is a one of the best funded, “good” hospitals in the Atlanta area. The building is new. The furnishings are nice. The care…lacking.
And I’ve yet to receive a satisfactory explanation nor follow up for this blatantly inexcusable poor care. While the new supervising doc quickly agreed to remove the first doc, she was only interested in looking forward.
I, on the other hand, still would like a CEO level review.
Perhaps one of my 3rd floor friends in the hall can let Piedmont Newnan know I’m still waiting on this.
If you really want to get better answers or prevent the suffering of others in your place, write the insurance company (f your mom has a 2nd carrier, even if it’s just a prescription or part D carrier) and asked why they allow the hospital to miss inform or diagnose a patient, which leads to additional costs they have to cover. If the bill they covered is extremely large, the insurance company will do a audit on the doc or other similar cases in the hospital. You would be amazed how fast a hospital will either quietly remove the problem or return your call if the actions on Ms. docs part are not sue-able. Might not end up helping mom directly but I can tell you when I started asking my late father’s insurer questions it made me feel better. Amazing that one of his doctors ‘moved on’ to a different hospital 4 months after I started annoying the insurance companies.