June 18, 2018 6:18 AM
Monday Morning Reads – June 18
Happy Monday, everyone! I hope you had a relaxing weekend.
As silly as this sounds, I agree with that video game addiction is real.
Know your fireworks law. Also, don’t be a jerk on July 4th.
Jackson Street Bridge has long been a meeting ground for suburban whites and tacky tourists. Now they’ll have a nice little park to congregate in!
To quote Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, “females are strong as Hell”
Here’s what people think about Georgia’s distracted driving law set to go into place next month. I think it’s dumb as Hell.
UGA is the nation’s number two party school. Do better, Athens. You can be number one again.
39 Comments
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
If i listen to music or podcasts while driving, i am not allowed to use my hands free headset to do so.
If i want to accept a call, i have to use my hands free headset.
As near as i can tell, that either leaves me choosing one of the two options for the duration of my drive (music or phone but not both) -or- it leaves me fidgeting with my bluetooth device to connect and disconnect it while a call is coming in.
(Since i never cover more than one ear and i can always hear sirens from outside the car, using my headset to listen to music and having it available to accept calls is much safer than fiddling with my bluetooth device.)
So it is legal for me to be on nonstop calls but it is effectively not legal for me to accept an occasional call.
Frustrating. I don’t do calls in busy traffic but it would be nice to be able to receive calls in 10 mph bumper to bumper jams or on that long i20 stretch from Atlanta to Augusta.
(I assume all the legislators have cars with integrated technology so this is not a problem for them, but i can’t afford that option.)
To me, logic would say that the law should read that your headset (whether used for phone calls or for music or anything else) cannot keep you from hearing sirens. Not sure why they didn’t choose that route instead.
How do you prove that the headset doesnt keep you from hearing sirens. From the government’s perspective I mean?
Actually I’ve been ticketed just last year for wearing sports type earbuds that hang over the ears but are not noise cancelling and in no way impair my ability to hear sirens, etc. Certainly less than bazooka speakers playing music. I was driving my 1999 pickup that doesn’t have bluetooth capabilities listening to spoken word directions from Siri. This was from a Gwinnett motorcycle cop running up the bill for a speeding ticket because I thought I was late for a medical appointment at a previously unknown location. I didn’t even try to argue the speeding ticket but a simple request for him to expedite the procedure was enough to fire Barney up and get the earphone ticket added. The judge didn’t hesitate in throwing it out.
My question on the new law is related to an incident in Gwinnett last year when a police sergeant first gave a weed smoking driver an elbow smash and then when backup arrived he promptly stomped on the head of the already subdued drug fiend. The stomping incident was videoed on a phone by a driver stopped in the left turn lane which was blocked by the combatants. That officer was fired later the same day. Then another video surfaced showing the initial stop and elbow smash by the GCP sergeant from another driver stopped at the light on the crossing road. He was then also fired for failing to mention this on his report.
Both videoing drivers would now be in violation of this new law recording a more heinous crime even though they were not operating the phones while moving. For similar incidents in the future does this negate videos obtained this way as evidence?
Forgot to add the irony on the earphone ticket. Barney was wearing a motorcycle helmet with built-in earphones and a microphone.
“Both videoing drivers would now be in violation of this new law recording a more heinous crime even though they were not operating the phones while moving. For similar incidents in the future does this negate videos obtained this way as evidence?”
I’ve had that asked and wondered that myself. Anyone know the answer?
Looks like GOP senator Jim Risch is caught up in the Mueller investigation. https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article213135899.html
I wonder how many more Republicans took Russian money? Anyone who took money from the NRA could be implicated.
But but but according to conservatives these children are getting the best care they have ever had.
Having been a townie in Athens back in the early 1970’s, I can appreciate UGa being named a party school by the Princeton Review. But seeing the Review’s choice for the Number 1 Party School is a reminder that Athens can only go just so far. How could they compete with Tulane and New Orleans? New Orleans is the sort of place where serving bad food can get you shot. New Orleans has / had drive-through daiquiri parlors. New Orleans has substantially different social mores than Athens. Not that the typical UGa student can’t party, but they’re running against a fast crowd.
Athens was “home” for me because that’s where my mail was being delivered for a few years, but I never really caught the Athens vibe. Somebody would ask me where I was from and I would say Athens. Their response? “Oh, wow. What a great party town!” And my image of “party” in Athens is my late Mother and her buddies sitting around drinking sherry and talking about how great the Reagan administration is. On the other hand, when school was out, Athens became very Southern and courtly.
From all that I know, the best college student manager was the late Dean William Tate. Don’t know how he’d fare with today’s model.
It very well could be that last little bit that will cause Ted Cruz to lose his Senate seat (he supports the policy)
Refugee camps become permanent residences, and so would this tent city. But I don’t think the children are even given accorded the honor of being a refugee. So it would be worse.
Are you ready for some TrumpCare! Due to his direct sabotage of the insurance markets, the benchmark health plans will go up over 1200.00/yr. Thats not counting any other reasons for increases…thats purely Trump’s doing
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/healthcare/news/2018/05/18/450943/state-state-estimated-premium-increases-due-individual-mandate-repeal-short-term-plan-rule/
Say the Democrats “win” this round of the immigration debate and are able to end deportations and implement a pathway to citizenship for nearly all undocumented people currently in the United States. Victory for them. But what about 10-15 years down the line? Take a look at the Democrats’ own rhetoric: stopping illegal immigration is impossible so long as the root cause – poverty – exists at our borders. So are the Democrats going to propose an immigration policy that reflects this rhetoric? Or are we going to maintain the show of having this massive immigration infrastructure – INS, Border Patrol, ICE – while simultaneously undercutting it by preventing it from actually DOING anything and issuing blanket legalization actions to millions of undocumented every decade or so?
What would a comprehensive Democratic approach to immigration and undocumented migration look like? Please no mentions of the “comprehensive immigration reform” bills that Democrats have put before Congress as – again – that only deals with the existing undocumented population and does nothing to address the future ones. I want to see such a plan put on the table and a real debate take place on it.
So withdraw the sham of a “bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform” bill. It is not actually bipartisan because it is only supported by a fraction of the GOP. And it is not comprehensive because it is only a contingency plan to deals with the status of the existing undocumented population – and inadequately at that – as opposed to dealing with everyone who wants to come here.
Here is an example: lots of people undergo significant sacrifices – years of waiting and costs into the many tens of thousands of dollars – attempting to come here with proper documents, and while they are here make even more sacrifices to endure the arduous task of retaining said documentation (often because they want to bring their families here, obtain citizenship or both). But if the Democratic laissez-faire (employing the one favored by libertarians for lack of a better one) approach to borders and immigration gets enacted, who is going to go through that process anymore? Think about what an international student has to go through right now. Why do that when you can just come here, stay and work for a couple of years, and then attend a state university at in-state tuition rates with financial aid to boot?
I am not going to make any comment as to whether the Democrat approach is wrong or right. The Democrats do have our historical Ellis Island approach to immigration as a powerful rhetorical device and precedent on their side, and the opposition hasn’t been able to come up with a worthy rebuttal to it (beyond mentioning that this was before the New Deal and Great Society, an argument that has been advanced with some success in some European countries where some steps to curtail immigration were taken). But the Democrats need to put forth some comprehensive policy on how we are going to treat documented and undocumented current and future immigrants. Being very liberal towards both, with the caveat that, say, future undocumented immigrants will have no path to permanent residency or citizenship (or at least a much harder one)?
Whatever it is, I’d like to hear it. Because to be honest, calling people racist for wanting existing laws to be enforced so that the rule of law will actually mean something – which is actually a sincere position for a lot of people, and for those who are a bit less sincere it gives them something very legitimate to hide behind and mask their true beliefs – isn’t going to win votes beyond current Democrat strongholds. All it takes to shut it down would be to ask: “Would the Democrats be so kind as to tell us which laws we should take seriously, which laws we should be allowed to break and why?” and that would be pretty much the end of it. The message shouldn’t be “the law should only apply to you if you are privileged.” Even if you sincerely believe it, it is not a winning message politically. So the Democrats need to elaborate a border/immigration policy and defend it.
So I am not a Democrat and I am not in the know but I think I can take a stab at some things here.
First, we have to all realize and admit to unfortunate truths to the immigration issue:
(1) There is no way to go back in time and apply any new measures put in place to prevent illegal immigration in the future to people who have already entered the US illegally in the past.
(2) Any solution put in place will take a supremely long time to actually lead to results if there is actually any intent to become effective on preventing illegal immigration.
In order to address the illegal immigration issue one has to first has to understand the problem. The problem has a root in the economies of the countries in which people illegally immigrate from. This administration has made a conscious effort to become isolationist. Isolationist strategies when it comes to illegal immigration will not actually solve the root problems. All isolationist policies towards these home countries will do is exacerbate economic problems, causing the standard of living to degrade, causing the people in those countries who just want to have a good life for their progeny to look elsewhere. Even with a wall (as if that will ever get built), people will try to enter the good economy country of the US. This will lead to a humanitarian crisis at the southern border. (we are seeing a small snippet of that now). Then the question becomes how do we morally address that crisis. (again, we are seeing that now).
The only real, long-term solution, really is a long-term solution. Why do we not see mass illegal immigration from Canada? Canada’s economy is significantly smaller than the United States’s economy and Canada will never be the US economically. We don’t see mass illegal immigration from Canada, however, because Canada has a robust economy. The robust economy comes from a good education system, access to affordable food, and public safety. Canadians know the US has more opportunity and a better economy but they do not illegally migrate to the US en masse because people would always sacrifice a little to stay home.
That is not true for many of our southern neighbors. Many of our southern neighbors have weak economies, poor education systems, lack of access to affordable food, and bad public safety. Apportioning fault for all of those situations, the vast majority will lie with the leadership in those countries, but First World countries like the US cannot be blameless. Historically, the US has had policies that harm some countries over others. In developing nations, this can lead to choices that prioritize military protectionism over educational systems or agricultural systems.
Regardless, history is history. What can the US do about it now? Well, we can either become more isolationist, knowing full-well that these countries will not suddenly reverse their fortunes, which will cause more people to seek a better life elsewhere or we can triple-down and focus on the root problems in these countries. We can focus like we never have before in helping these countries create better education systems, better agricultural systems, better public safety. The results of investments like this long-term, would improve the economies in those countries and lead to lessened illegal immigration to the US.
Countries like Panama and Costa Rica have better economies than their neighbors and we do not tend to see many illegal immigrants from those countries (granted they are further south). That said, can you imagine if El Salvador or Nicaragua had economies, education, and agricultural similar to Greece, Portugal, or Malaysia that people would leave their homes? I can’t.
The last unfortunate truth is that this administration has chosen to be isolationist for short-term gain but don’t seem to have a long-term plan. Do I like the US being the piggy-bank to the world? No. Do I understand why we are? Yes.
We are the piggy-bank to the world because for the longest time we have realized humanity is only as good as its weakest link. The US has spent my entire lifetime, whether through Republican or Democratic administrations, trying to improve the weakest links throughout the world. I may not always agree with the methods or plans on how the government thinks it can improve those weak links, but it has always been a concerted effort and goal to improve the weakest links.
This administration has a completely different plan than any of its predecessors. They do not want to improve the weakest links. This administration doesn’t care about other links so long as our link remains intact. This administration fails to realize that when the weakest link is broken we no longer have a chain.
It is truly disappointing.
That really is a great post. One of the worst things that have been happening besides forcibly separating children from their parents is the fact that many people who came here “illegally” have become part of the fabric of our communities. A perfect example is the restaurant owner in IL who was forcibly removed because he had a DUI 20 years ago. This is a person who paid taxes and provided jobs but basically has gotten swirled down the drain in an effort at ethnic cleansing.
I understand the whole we pay more at the UN complaint but would you rather the UN be in Bejing or Moscow? If we give up leading it’s not like there’s no longer going to be a leader. It’s just that someone else is going to step up to the plate and it could not even be a democracy leading.
Thanks for the kind words. I don’t post on here all that often, but do try to keep up most days.
And you are absolutely right about the leadership vacuum, but I suspect that was actually the plan all along.
Apparently we had the same train of thought….
There are political reasons why you won’t see many in the GOP support a bipartisan bill, but those who can vote for it probably have the unspoken support of many who can’t for those political reasons. And it doesn’t matter if it’s 10% of the GOP or 20%. Anything that gets passed demonstrates enough support that the GOP would even bring it to a vote. And we could have had a bill passed at least twice by now if the Detainer in Chief had actually stuck to the words that came out of his mouth and wanted a solution. But the reality is that the Complainer in Chief doesn’t want a solution, because if he can’t complain about immigration, he has nothing to rile up his base. You see how he is trying to pin all the blame on the Dems. Because he needs immigration to be a problem so that he can get votes. It is ugly ugly pathetic.
And … it is we the voters who support this system. President Trump and Congress wouldn’t be doing things the way they are if they didn’t think it was working.
Georgia had two officer involved shootings, in three days, last week.
https://chamblee54.wordpress.com/2018/06/17/chavius-hollis-and-joseph-villanueva/
These are the bills regarding the separation of children from their parents at the border.
Help Separated children, bill number 2937
Keep Families together, bill number 3036
Sen. Perdue 404.865.0087
Sen. Isakson 770.661.0999
GA04 Rep. Johnson 770 987-2291
GA05 Rep. Lewis 404 659-0116
GA06 Rep. Handel 770 998-0049
GA07 Rep. Woodall 770 232-3005
GA11 Rep. Loudermilk 770 429-1776
When you contact these numbers, please be considerate of the person taking your call. It is not helpful to make an angry speech. Just ask them to support bill 2937 and bill 3036
Please only contact the Congressional representative from your district.
I called. Loudermilk supports the separation of parents at the border, Isakson does not and is working on a bipartisan solution and Perdue does not know what he thinks.
Perdue knows what he thinks. He just doesn’t have the spine to say it and abide by it.
Well, you can color me totally unsurprised to get that answer out of Perdue’s office. He’s such a hack every he says something I start laughing.
Supremes to all the Gerrys out there wanting to mander: Fire at will!
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/18/606017026/supreme-court-punts-on-partisan-gerrymandering-leaving-status-quo-in-place
The winning political party has been drawing voting districts since there have been voting districts. Why is it so horrid now! Didn’t see the Weenies complainung when it was done by the Dims. Start winning elections and you too can draw the districts instead of letting the courts enact your policies from the bench!
Да, товарищ. Продолжайте перемешивать этот горшок.
I’ve been against political gerrymandering since featuring it on my high school debate team. Georgia was very much a one-party state at that time with the Democrats being that party. We had rampant gerrymandering along both political and racial lines at that time. Just because it has been a tradition in this country since Patrick Henry did it to James Madison doesn’t make it right or a right. Districts should be drawn using an algorithm that groups neighborhoods, then communities, then political boundaries like cities and counties, then geographic boundaries if necessary without regard to party, religion, race, sex (or lack thereof), etc.
Y’alls hand wringing is so admirable! Lol! Tell you what, win a couple of state houses once in a while and y’all can hold the crayons!
At some point, one party has to have the maturity to understand the crayons belong to the whole classroom, and share like big boys and girls.
Again, you guys never cried for the literal decades of Dim gerrymandering, so just stop…
I wasn’t politically engaged until about the turn of the century. And I could care less about so-and-so did this, then so-and-so did that. The past is muddied, and you can’t escape that swamp if your feet are stuck in that mud.
The FFLOTUS league has been activated…
https://twitter.com/MichelleObama/status/1008768272895012867
How to hurt oil workers coal miners, farmers (including cotton farmer) and car makers… AKA as the Trump voting blocks of The South, The Midwest, Coal Country, and Alaska.
https://www.axios.com/us-china-trade-war-tariffs-boeing-ford-3685d598-8251-45b6-8709-74e7349f0c7d.html
“The Justice Department’s internal watchdog told Congress on Monday that an FBI agent’s anti-Trump text messages were “deeply troubling” and sowed doubts about the integrity of an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email arrangement, but he reiterated that he found no evidence that political bias had affected the FBI’s handling of the probe.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/politics-didnt-sway-fbis-handling-of-clinton-probe-watchdog-tells-congress-1529349746?mod=e2tw
It should also be noted the IG stated he is investigating FBI leeks, including the New York office, and Comey’s memos.
Apparently that whole family separation thing at the Mexican border is just a plain old fashioned hostage taking for the purpose of extortion:
[Pres. Trump] And I say it’s — very strongly — the Democrats’ fault. They’re really obstructionist and they are obstructing. The United States will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility — won’t be,” Trump said at an event about promoting American activity in space.
The president added: “If the Democrats would sit down instead of obstructing, we could have something done very quickly. Good for the children, good for the country, good for the world. It could take place quickly. We could have an immigration bill, we could have child separation. We’re stuck with these horrible laws. They’re horrible laws. What’s happening is so sad. It’s so sad. And it can be taken care of quickly and beautifully and we’ll have safety.”
Trump made the remarks when, in fact, it is his own administration’s policy to separate immigrant children from their parents at the border. The president himself could immediately put an end to the practice without legislative action.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/18/trump-repeatedly-blames-democrats-for-family-separation-policy.html
Who is surprised…
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-trump-tower-fish-kill-20180618-story.html
Y’all.Will.Never.Stop! Save the Snail Darter!!!
You don’t seem to be aware how important the Great Lakes fish population and water protections are. When they tried to cut the funding for the shore line and the heavy soils clean up fund (think Brownfields for lake beds, ALL Great Lake house reps on the lakes, senators and governors got it left in place (and got the fund increased). The fish population keeps the lake and river entries clean so the water is not clogging the industrial cooling systems (including nuclear power plants) and lower the processing at water treatment plants for the hundreds of communities who draw drinking water from all 5 lakes. Additionally the Illinois system is ever more strict, since the Illinois and Chicago Rivers are the only things stopping the Asian Carp from getting into the Great Lakes to destroy the fishing, tourist and shipping industries.