Emory Law Professor’s Use of the “n-word” Shows Something Deeper
Recently, a professor at Emory Law School was accused of using the n-word during class while discussing a case. The school did not fire the professor, but they did order-in some Starbucks-type unconscious bias training. Pressure by students on this issue forced the school to deal with a deeper issue that using the n-word makes obvious.
People don’t slip up and accidentally use the n-word. People use the n-word in public because they have used the n-word in the past. Even people who use it with a disclaimer such as, “I hate to even say this, but he was acting like such a [n-word]” are as guilty as the people who hurl the ugly word at every black person they see. It is just like the people who say “I hate to interrupt” while interrupting anyway. Those people may hate to interrupt but they did it anyway and interrupted intentionally. If a professor is comfortable enough to say the n-word in class, I am willing to bet my law school loans it is not his first time.
People who use historically derogatory words fall into two distinct groups. Either a person is comfortable using the word and uses the word regularly OR a person never uses the words and it takes conscious thought and effort for the word to come up into their brain and come out of their mouth. Inherent bias training can’t help the former prejudiced group. However, I believe America has far more of the latter who may benefit from bias training if they are willing to accept that they are need of it.
#MakeAmericaGreatAgain became viewed as the calling card of people who wanted to go back to a time when using the n-word was an acceptable daily occurrence. I know not all #MAGA lovers uplift the use of the n-word as the main reason to turn back the clock. However, let us acknowledge that this Emory professor is just one of an increasing number of incidents where people are caught on camera using the slur openly since Trump’s election. Those who think #MAGA simply means returning to a safer, kinder, gentler America, be warned that you are paddling in the same boat as the people who see #MAGA as code for the not too distant past when derogatory use of the n-word was found in school books, newspapers, and on television.
Emory Law Interim Dean, James B. Hughes Jr. wrote in a response to the incident, “We can – and will – do better.” Then the dean made a decision that no student for the next two years will be required to take that professor’s class. Law school is only three years long – so basically the school said they will just wait out the students who felt offended and then start fresh and pretend nothing happened. That is not doing better. In fact, that is what America keeps doing. Lets all just pretend it did not happen, let time pass, and we will all get over it. Getting over the n-word will never happen until some Americans address their biases that make them feel they have the authority to use that word in the first place.[i]
The professor also wrote a long winded lawyerly response. Look — either you use the word or you don’t. If you don’t use that word, have never used that word, and there is no chance on earth that the word would have come out of your mouth then say so. There is an equally ugly s-word used to offend the Hispanic community.[ii] If someone accused me of using that word – I would be able to say unequivocally they did not hear that word come out of my mouth. I certainly wouldn’t say, “maybe I said spit and you misunderstood me.” Nah. Nope. Not possible. At home, I curse like a sailor. But I have never in all my years said a curse word in court even if it was a part of the evidence I was presenting.
If he used the n-word in his role as a professor, I have reason to believe he has used the word privately or in his past. That likelihood increases the chances he has an inherent bias against [n-words] that even he may not be aware of. There is a bigger chance he is aware of the causes of his biases, but like his letter, has explained it away with a litany of excuses. Although I understand the need of the professor to explain his side of the story, it still sounds like he feels there was a legitimate excuse to ever use that word in a university setting. To clear up any confusion, if the term is relevant to the discussion you can use the term “n-word” and we all know exactly what you mean. Thank you!
The rule here is that because of America’s history – there are things that are now and will forever be unacceptable under all circumstances. No further debate, explanation, and reasoning should be needed after the period of that sentence. In 2018, we should not accept excuses from anyone who violates that rule. We must all acknowledge that people who still choose to use that term are holding our country back.
The professor ended his explanation by saying “I feel compelled to make this clear to combat any narrative that would make assumptions that I am a racist or white supremacist or inhospitable towards racial minorities.” Well professor you can be very hospitable towards minorities in your class, “good morning Mrs. Jones.” It is very possible that you are not a white supremacist with the silly desire to form a white ethnostate. You can also not be a racist because you have not used a position of power to prohibit minority participation. But that does not resolve the deeper issue of your inner thoughts and biases against minorities that slipped out so casually during your class discussion. In 2018 America, if you have ever yelled the word in anger at the guy who cut you off, or thought it while watching television about the black person accused of a heinous crime, or even sat tacitly by while a white counterpart casually used the word … then I feel compelled to make this clear to you … there is something deeper about yourself you must address.
…then I feel compelled to make this clear to you … there is something deeper about yourself you must address.
It is the same something deeper that is allowing division to continue in America. That something deeper that allows some white southerners to continue this “heritage not hate” lie. The type of people who say quietly, “I would never wave the confederate flag, but I have family who do so I understand.” It is the same something deeper that let Trump get elected despite the fact we heard him use the p-word ON TAPE. “Grab them by the [p-word].” No one can address that something deeper for you, except for you.
The reason why the very easy to understand prohibited word concept was lost on a longtime law professor is because of that deep down something that many white Americans refuse to address. It is no more your fault that you had a relative who slandered blacks around the thanksgiving table than it is my fault that some men in my community have horrible things to say about gay men. It IS your fault, however, if still in 2018 you refuse to address it. I can no longer abide by the rule, “well its grandpa just let him say what he wants he is from another time.” No GRANDPA! If you are still alive in 2018 know that certain things are no longer tolerated – like marrying a 14-year-old or using the n-word.
I have corrected a number of older men in my community who still think whispered comments about a gay man’s sexuality is appropriate. I address them with a kind voice but a direct statement, “that is not acceptable anymore and I don’t want you to use that language because it makes us both look bad.” To people who are not family I’ve taken a statement from a friend on social media, “I don’t know what I’ve done to make you feel I would be comfortable with you saying something like that around me, but I don’t condone that language and I find it despicable.” Then you hold a long “momma glare” to express how serious you are.[iii]
You can’t tell people how to live their life or truly control what they say. But if more of us stand up and correct people we will shape America into what we want it to be. Not “great again,” just GREAT! In the same way social media has ruined the businesses of people who have used slurs in public, we in our individual lives must do the same and shame people out of using words that divide us. Yet, if like this professor, you have excuse after excuse then you are not digging deep enough to address your inherent bias and you are one of the reasons America hasn’t reached the appropriate level of greatness.
Like the Emory law students, American’s should not be opposed to asking people to take a sabbatical until they address their deep-seated issues. People with ingrained biases should not be teaching law to any student, holding a public office, or making decisions that could impact others.
[i] We know there will always be neo-nazi’s who use the word – but they don’t count. No one listens to those guys except themselves.
[ii] If you don’t know what word I am referring to, then good for you. You were raised well!
[iii] A momma glare is that look your mom gave you in church which said, “sit down, shut your mouth, and don’t move a muscle” without her uttering one word.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I read this piece. There are things that I agree with, and things I do not agree with. I could write a response. However, this response would not make me happy, nor do anything to improve the situation described in this piece.
FWIW, the picture on facebook, illustrating this post, has the magic word in it. Should we hold GaPol to the same standards we are holding the professor to?
“In 2018 America, if you have ever yelled the word in anger at the guy who cut you off, or thought it while watching television about the black person accused of a heinous crime, or even sat tacitly by while a white counterpart casually used the word … then I feel compelled to make this clear to you … there is something deeper about yourself you must address”
This applies to GaPol. They posted a picture with the magic word on facebook. If it is wrong for a professor to use this word in class, it is wrong for GaPol to post a picture of it on facebook. Everything that is happening to the Emory Professor should now happen to GaPol.
I have a screenshot, if you choose to delete this.
Oh my aching ass, in what context did this professor use the word? Was he trying to slur someone, to demean them?
I don’t see why you are so gun-shy now, Dawn. You typed “nigger” plenty of times when you were writing this post:
https://www.georgiapol.com/2018/08/07/who-is-georgia/
@MattMD if you think it matters what context it was used in then you have missed the entire point.
@chamblee54 there are people who contribute to GeorgiaPol who cannot say THAT word. But I assure you the person who wrote this absolutely can. And if you want to discuss the difference between you, them, and me then you are avoiding the self reflection this piece is about.
Get over yourself, LaDawn. You are exactly the type of leftist loon that the Trump supporters on this site make into cartoon characters.
Understand one thing real quick: You do not have any right to tell me what words I can or cannot say.
“#MakeAmericaGreatAgain became viewed as the calling card of people who wanted to go back to a time when using the n-word was an acceptable daily occurrence.”
I do not like Mr. Trump. However, I am much more concerned about his crookedness, and mental instability, than I am his racial values. The Democrats made a big mistake by making the election a referendum on racism. Telling people “If you don’t vote for my candidate then you are a racist” is a terrible political strategy. It may very well have cost the Democrats the election.
I think there’s a several big differences bw saying “Your candidate is racist” and “Vote for us or you’re racist”.
Although there’s maybe not much difference between the former and saying “Vote for us or you’re supporting racism.”
See the difference?
I think there is a narrative out there- espoused by several on this blog- that would like you to not to see the difference.
That same narrative would also like to ignore all the other reasons the Dem party says “Vote for us.” Just review the comments, you’ll see who’s trying to boil the election narrative down to “All Dems are running on is racism”.
I will ask again, what is democratic party running on other than I hate Trump and if you don’t vote for me you are a racist?
Oh if you liked your tax cut, sorry, I am going to take it away from you. Why on earth would anyone vote for that platform?
You will ask again and again and again because it doesn’t matter that a number of people have answered you fully again and again and again. Save yourself some time, go to CPUSA.com, and convince yourself that’s all that matters.
What’s loony? It’s a deep dive into culture and how we understand ourselves and others.
And she’s not telling you what you can or cannot say. She’s saying that what you and others say has latent psychological origins along with historical-cultural implications. And if you say something or hear something, you should explore those depths.
For instance, you used the word Matt, and I sense you used it as a defensive measure in reaction to perceived authoritarianism, all in response to resistance to the thought of having to do such exploratory work in any event.
There are a lot of folks on this site who refuse to explore the underpinnings of their words and opinions. It’s not easy work, and it can be work. But your response proves there is always room for growth.
I typed a word that someone else used that is supposed to be not spoken. To your point, if in some case the word “nigger” had some historical implication, are you saying it should be covered up by the “n-word”? It just seems so trite and easy.
How many books are we going to have to edit or censor when we read them?
“How many books are we going to have to edit or censor when we read them?”
None.
And you have the freedom of speech to say or write any word you would like.
This article is about the consequences of saying or writing certain words.
You may have a right of speech but I have a right to oppose your speech or writings.
The professor wrote that it was a mistake. I do not know them so I will give them a pass this time.
Emory is a private institution and has the right to regulate their environment- including speech or writings.
Society as a whole regulates how we behave.
I do not speak or write several words that are offensive to other people. I was taught by my parents those words caused negative emotions and it was bad manners anyway. As an adult I continue that practice.
If I heard you say that word I would not hire you. If I was a patient of yours and you used that word I would find another MD.
Your actions have consequences-both positive and negative.
I’ve read both Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer about three times each. I did not self censor when I read them because I understood they were written back when using the n-word was acceptable in Missouri.
Did you post that picture on facebook?
I really don’t care if you use the magic word. However, when a non POC website advertises a post, denouncing the magic word, by posting a picture of a sign that contains this word… maybe that is not a problem to you, but it is at the very least ironic.
As far as “the self reflection this piece is about”… who says I don’t? Race talk gets shoved in your face every day. One more post about who can, or cannot, say the magic word is not going to make any difference.
Can we still say “niggardly”?
Probably not Indypendant…. because oversensitive nitwits are not smart enough to know the word…Go try to find a Tarzan movie. Heck I didn’t know he was racist! How is that?
Go find Uncle Remus. Good luck. Who can get a DVD of Song of the South any more?
I read Brer Rabbit to my kids. Try to read Huck Finn in school. Some liberal nitwit will feint.
This politically correct nonsense is over the top tiresome. It grows longer every day. Oh, I can’t bear to hear a conservative speaker at my ninnyfied candy-ass liberal university these days…
Is there a pest control service like Orkin that can help with these liberal pests?
https://chamblee54.wordpress.com/2018/09/22/another-internet-squabble/
The spectacle of a non-poc website posting a picture of the n-word, to advertise a post denouncing the use of the n-word, is just plain weird.
Another way liberals infect another institution…The Presumption of Guilt….what say you attorneys on the blog? WSJ. Turning the legal system on its ear…for their own benefit but not others.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-presumption-of-guilt-1537570627
Honestly Charlie. Why does this guy get the privilege of sharing his ranting keyboard diarrhea anytime, anywhere, and always?
So…don’t comment on a WSJ article, no less, just whine as to its being linked? Seriously, Will, you’re better than that. Much, much better!
Ah, and you’re playing the willfully obtuse card once again.
I couldn’t tough it out to make it through this one, LJB, but I may try later this weekend.
Same hear.
I intend to read it and absorb it, but I am unlikely to comment on it here as there is no point.
Lol! The Long Suffering Lib??
The issue of hurtful and offensive words always sparks controversy along predictable lines. One group argues that they have the right to say anything at any time to anybody. “My rights trump everything else.” Another group says if you can say this word or that word that means everyone should say it. I call this the two wrongs make one right school of thought.
I view usage of words in this context: What does it cost me not to use certain words? What is the potential impact to others of my use of those words? As I read LBJ’s post that was my first reaction. If you read it and made the focus your “rights” or you’re offended by that fact that some people get to use a word that you can’t use, I agree with her assessment that you need to look at your motives for wanting to use these words. You need to ask how it benefits you to call someone an “n-word” or whatever slur you’re fighting for the right to use. And, then ask if you win this right how would it affect the people who have a genuine reason for not wanting certain words to become a part of the everyday vocabulary.
I really don’t get the emotional investment in wanting to use certain words that you know will hurt or inflame a large portion of the population.