Covid-19: Put Perspective Ahead Of Panic
Today is crossover day, what is normally one of the busiest days of the Georgia General Assembly. And yet, the thoughts and actions of many are elsewhere, and thus a few words here about the Covid-19 virus, reeling financial markets, potential government responses, and what the next few weeks will likely look like.
Imagine if you will that sixty one million Americans catch a rapidly spreading and not yet fully understood illness. That would be almost one in every five of us. It would change everything permanently, right?
It already happened – just one decade ago. In 2009, the H1N1 “swine flu” virus did just that according to the CDC. I was told that number this morning by a friend and I pushed back hard. It had to be a typo. People would have had to have had that virus and not even known it…
I believe that’s likely where we are, and/or will be with Covid-19, a/k/a Caronavirus. Right now, there’s still a lot we don’t know, and everyone is assuming the worst. It’s with the stat we have in hand from 2009 that we can start to put perspective over panic, but still understand what lies ahead and prepare.
First, let’s understand that because of a wide disparity of testing among countries in the first wave of this disease, we’re still not even sure what the mortality rate of this virus is. We’re tending to test those that are showing the worst symptoms, and early death rates on any new virus outbreak are always much higher than the actual mortality rates, as those with less severe conditions are often not tested/diagnosed with the illness at all.
Here’s a slide show attempting to put the nature of this virus into perspective of a likely actual mortality rate, as well as severity compared to other widely know, easily spread communicable diseases. Short answer: If you’re not older/elderly and/or have preexisting issues with your cardio-pulmonary system, your Covid-19 risk is mostly a bad case of the flu. Note the last slide. I don’t “blame the media”, but it’s clear we’re obsessed with this disease far more than any other disease outbreak, ever. Again, perspective is needed.
Regardless, countries around the world are undertaking massive and unprecedented efforts to contain the spread of this virus which is spread by person to person contact. Even as I type this, closures and cancellations are escalating too rapidly to mention individually. This is both a result of, and contributing to, the anxiety surrounding the disease.
That’s not to say everyone is overreacting. Let’s go back to the unknowns, and I’m not trying to second guess anyone here – especially those that have better and more current information than I do.
The rest of March and likely early April will be like no spring we’ve experienced in decades, if ever. We’re going to be asked (at least, for now it’s an ask) to stay home. We need to as much as possible.
Let’s go back to the H1N1-Swine Flu stats. If one in five of us got that, then likely a lot of us already have Covid-19, or will have it. We may never know that we have it, but we can still spread it without knowing it. Thus, we need to be especially careful with interactions with those in high risk groups. These people again, are older/elderly Americans and those with lung or heart issues.
So, a lot of people will be looking to government for solutions, while others will be blaming them because “someone should have done something”. I commend the Governor and his task for for gathering the information available and disseminating facts without inflaming panic, while also marshaling the state’s resources to further prepare and act. I likewise commend The Speaker, Lt. Governor, and Legislative leaders for getting the supplemental budget done with additional funds for Covid-19 response so that the state is fully funded through June, and then acting as an example in the suspension of legislative activities.
In times like this, it’s important to remember that the power of government has limitations. We have a responsibility as individuals and citizens to take precautions from constant hand washing to limiting our participation in public events.
This is going to have a major impact on the world’s economy, and the American economy is not immune. The stock market has gone from a record high to a bear market in the shortest time on record. If you haven’t sold stocks now, not only are you likely too late, but quite possibly will find yourself selling at the bottom. Again, perspective over panic.
90 days from now we’ll likely not be dealing with Covid-19. The Fed today announced a technical move to add $1.5 Trillion of liquidity to backstop the financial system. Expect a litany of fiscal proposals to keep consumers spending.
There will be economic pain, and it will be real. Now’s where it is time to remember that many economic statistics are lagging indicators. We’ll almost certainly see the economy contract this quarter and next, considering spending in many sectors of the economy will be frozen for the March, the last of Q1, and April, the first month of Q2. That means we’ll almost certainly be in a recession. By the time that becomes official in mid-summer, we’ll likely already be out of it. Internalize this now, so you don’t get bogged down by this “bad news” later.
The collapse of the oil market combined with the lowest interest rates on record will put money in a lot of spender’s pockets too. When the panic subsides, most sectors of the US economy will be awash with cash. Markets will rebound. So again, look past the current panic and inconvenience and think what things will be like before making any economic decisions for your household.
There are a lot of policy angles that will be proposed in a panic to fix this problem, the oil market, and the overall economy. Let’s focus on making sure the health crisis is fixed as the top priority. We’ll then need to make sure those most affected that work paycheck to paycheck in industries most affected (think hospitality workers who make no money when people don’t book hotels or go out) have a safety net.
Beyond that, we can sort out bigger picture policy/spending issues in a more methodical manner. Let’s not minimize what must be done in this crisis, but let’s also beware of those who wish to use the crisis for unrelated agendas.
Be prudent. Be proactive. But above all, keep it all in perspective.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Good conclusion. It is well-established that many people don’t well evaulate risk.
US coronavirus testing has been bad, so casualty rates are still unknown. I agree the 1-3% death rates that have been reported are significantly higher than the actual rate, but those rates would have to be by a factor of 100 to compare to H1N1. (The H1N1 hospitalization rate was 0.4% and death rate was 0.02% per your link.) The 60M US cases being spread over a year didn’t overwhelm the healthcare system..
Care to elaborate on what is wrong with the oil market? I think lower prices, and particualy less oil use, are a good combination.
That’s definitely worthy of it’s own topic/series of posts, but as we’re primarily Georgia politics not going there yet. It is, in my opinion, a long term national security issue that will be with us a lot longer than the threat of Covid-19.
An attempted abbreviated answer: The market has been oversupplied, mostly because of the explosive growth in the production here in the US, specifically from US shale oil reserves. New technology has allowed us to get oil out of the ground that we’ve long known was there, but we weren’t able to drill cost effectively. That cost has been dropping rapidly, and the raw cost could well be down to $40 or lower by now.
A couple of problems with that: A lot of other world economies support their entire country with oil revenues. Saudi Arabia can produce oil at a break even price of about $10, but they need several times that to fund government and social programs. Russia has also grown dependent on high oil prices.
The two of them had largely been controlling OPEC’s production, but a week ago Russia decided they had had enough, and apparently only went to the OPEC meeting to tell everyone to pound sand. Saudi decided to make the Russians feel pain, and they immediately cut prices on oil for short deliveries by about $8/barrel, and have committed to flood the market with additional supply.
This supply surge comes at a time when China had already cut back purchases because of their internal economic contraction, then Covid-19 made that worse. Now, airlines aren’t flying nearly as many planes and developed economies are doing whatever they can to suppress mobility. Demand for oil is dropping, and fast.
The US problem here is that the US oil industry, specifically the shale producers, are highly, highly leveraged. You can conclude that Saudi and Russia aren’t really fighting each other, but it’s all a show to bankrupt US shale producers so that they/OPEC can return to high prices.
Oil drillers get no sympathy here at home, but no one really wants to return to the days when mideast conflicts can send the price of oil to $150/barrel and hold our economy hostage in the process.
The policy solution now that North America is finally energy independent is to put some sort of moat around domestic production, where we charge tariffs for imported oil, possibly put extraction fees for anything exported if applicable, but generally make both of those punitive enough where the US produces what it consumes.
Another policy implication that this too long answer will only touch on but is equally real: for those that want to talk about conversion to electric cars and doing away with oil, our electric utilities have been shifting from coal to natural gas. Nat gas is a byproduct of oil extraction. If we shut down a large portion of domestic oil production, it’s a virtual certainty electric rates would go up, and fast.
I know you are trying to avoid a discussion on this. Thanks for your perspective. Oil and gas industry is/was all about exports and private profits. the “energy independence’ is a myth, unless, as you suggest, we make/regulate our resources for our own consumption and the private export profits be damned. Removing those pesky corporate socialism subsidies could also be considered. However, creating incentives and possible subsidies for alternate energy sources to balance our needs, and resources, could be a jobs creator and jobs retention plan. The current energy giants should embrace this for the future.
Not so much trying to avoid the discussion as not wanting to divert from the main topic which needs much better actual understanding: Covid-19 and the need for rational response (both in individual restraint of normal activity and federal fiscal policy to minimize the economic damage).
Going off memory here but I believe until about 2-3 years ago domestic oil & gas producers weren’t allowed by law to export. On the oil side it wasn’t that big of a deal as we were such net importers. Now, things are different. I believe we export a net amount of oil, but have been building the infrastructure to export a significant amount of liquified nat gas. Until recently, we had burned a lot if not most of it off as waste (flaring), and even now a lot of that is done because the domestic price is so low and thus additional pipelines/storage for the nat gas isn’t economically feasible. That was changing.
I’ve always been of the opinion that we need an “all of the above” energy strategy. I think it’s a lot easier to get to rational decisions about what that mix looks like if we start with the policy goal of domestic energy independence and build out from there. What is incentivized/subsidized vs what is taxed/tariffed needs to be rooted on playing to our strengths that we have now, and balanced against where we need to be a decade and generation from now.
“Let’s not minimize what must be done in this crisis, but let’s also beware of those who wish to use the crisis for unrelated agendas.”
Should I post the many quotes from the POTUS who has directly downplayed the crisis for unrelated agendas ?
But thanks for the forecasting anyway, “Doctor”.
”
but let’s also beware of those who wish to use the crisis for unrelated agendas.”
Case in point:
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
It’s now very likely that we’ll have two quarters of negative economic growth, if that wasn’t clear when this post was written. We can be optimistic it will have turned around by third quarter.
Nevertheless Steve Mnuchin was on ABC today, where instead of preparing the country, Mnuchin refused to acknowledge reality as well as acquiesced to Trump’s bashing of Fed Chair Powell.
The words of the constellation of sycophant satellites surrounding Trump are belied by the fact their first priority is stroking the ego of their sociopathic star. Why heed any words of theirs to not put your our self interest first when they put Trump’s first on a daily basis?