It’s Time for Congress to Act on Rural Broadband
I just read this fascinating profile of Senator Joe Manchin in a recent New Yorker (“recent,” as in, from June, but if you have ever subscribed to the New Yorker you understand that it publishes at a relentless pace, and you are doing pretty well if you are on an issue from June of this year) in which a high school teacher from rural West Virginia notes that he had students who took their 2020 AP exams in a McDonald’s parking lot because there is such limited access to broadband internet in that state.
Georgia is not that much different, nor is much of the rest of the rural United States. In fact, an estimated 20 million Americans still do not have internet in their homes.
The COVID-19 pandemic made it clear that our lives — and livelihoods — are largely dependent on the internet. Doctors appointments, virtual school, work, religious services, and even social engagements were able to happen for people who have reliable and fast internet access. People who lack that internet access missed more than a year’s worth of those same opportunities and necessities. Right now, there’s an historic opportunity for congressional leaders to capitalize on this opportunity to bring broadband to all and – finally – close the digital divide.
There are three main drivers of this digital divide: affordability, adoptability, and accessibility. The federal government’s affordability programs have helped but they simply do not finish bridging that divide: 44% of Americans who earn less than $30,000 a year do not have broadband at home according to the National Digital Inclusion Alliance.
We also need to fund programs that increase digital literacy training. In addition, the National Urban League’s Digital Equity Plan recommends a national office of Digital Equity to coordinate training and education programs so all Americans regardless of their background can learn to harness the internet.
Finally, we need to build on our current networks to expand broadband access to communities that currently lack any meaningful connectivity. Even though broadband coverage with multiple competing networks is available to the vast majority of Americans, 26% of rural Americans lack access to any broadband networks at all. It’s critical that Congress prioritize bringing broadband access to these communities.
We have an opportunity to get everyone in America connected to the internet, and the quickest way to permanently close the digital divide is to build on what works: prioritizing expanding access to communities that lack broadband access, and funding a permanent program that provides financial help to low-income households and improves adoption rates.
There is no doubt in my mind that in Georgia, there are students who had to get creative about how and where they took their AP exams, just as there were in West Virginia. States are working hard to try to solve this issue, but as rural broadband access is not unique to any one state or jurisdiction, it is clear that it is time for Congress to act.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I was talking with someone about reviving rural Georgia. I said Starlink will become available in the next year in Georgia. $500 for the equipment and $99/month fee and you set it up yourself. I thought it would really help enticing folks to move to cheaper homes in rural areas.
He said it may be too late. The healthcare in rural areas have been starved to near death since the Republicans did not expand Medicaid (even with Feds chipping in big money). Also education is a big problem in rural areas as well. Teachers can have better incomes teaching in metro areas.
Running a fiber network to a home costs about $4500.
I think Georgia should at least help defray the equipment costs of Starlink for rural areas. Elon Musk said recently Starlink will have global coverage in the next year and that they will be cutting the upfront costs as the sales go up. 500,000 people (including me) paid $99 to sign up for the beta Starlink program so far.
The lack of hospitals might not be such a big deal for some young people as they don’t need much medical care but as I understand it the problem really is that there are no doctors. The reason there are no doctors is because of the AMA stranglehold on the legislature that won’t relax the requirements for nurse practitioners to prescribe. I don’t see any of that changing. There may be some people willing to move due to broadband but I also have heard complaints about the rural culture (close minded values) being a problem too along with schools.
A video on setting up Starlink.